Search results

So the configuration showed it's capability across multiple entrants doing everything else you suggest and just because three of the four broke or crashed they should get a mulligan? Yes. It should be BOP'd. If your angle is the subset of Runoffs and HST entrants representing the whole of one...

I don't understand what you're suggesting.

3 of the top 4 Honda's didn't finish, Stacked the front end of the field in qually, and held the fastest race lap.... just saying that it's not out of the blue...

The Lifeline Fire Marshal (mechanical or electrical) carries FIA 8865-2015 rating - and it carries homologation on that design through 2027. I believe your reference to the technical list is date of last allowable manufacture - at that point the manufacture would then need to re-homologate with...

Lifeline stuff is awesome, available through your favorite retailer. Their Fire Marshal series is affordable, super light, and really compact.

I must have missed the subtle verbiage change for '24. Just curious on rationale? Being unrestricted, especially rocker arms, could lead to a whole host of changes. Assuming since valve lift is the major outcome of a geometry change, and lift is as measured at the valve, we don't really care...

Re-read the letter - or to keep it easy, just the title. As far as the Prod committee and CRB wanting to expand on my nudge, thats their prerogative - obviously they have something to suggest this may suit the 3 classes. Tim Schreyer -Real Race Car Driver who typically does just a bit better...

You hit the nail on the head. That is precisely the entire basis of the proposal. We'll just have to agree to disagree that the heavier/higher HP formula vs the lighter/lower HP formula is in some sort of balance right now. In regards to your silent majority comment... What is the SCCA or any...

My final thought, Regardless of your stance or mine on 100TW-200TW tires, this wheel proposal still applies to whichever rubber you would like to wrap around your wheels and is easily forward and backward compatible to wherever the tire industry, or the SCCA regulations may take us. Saying that...

Philosophically, I think the ruleset should reflect intentions of those looking to maximize the ruleset at a Majors/Runoffs level. Downstream of that, there is nothing preventing a competitor from not building to the max of the rules. I think its silly to have probably the 2nd most...

IMO, anything less than a real slick has no place in the production category. There are plenty of categories that should prioritize a true DOT radial before Production... Any flavor of the touring groups including IT and ST make way more sense before production or GT. Let's build 12:1-14:1...

Sharing my original letter: Background: EP cars largely fall into (2) main categories of wheel sizes; early model cars that had less than 15” factory wheels that are spec lined at a 15”x7” wheel size, and late model cars with factory offerings greater than 15” that are spec lined at an 18”x8”...

1.) Yes 2.) No 3.) No 4.) 2 5.) Schaafsma - Go Cendiv!

The M3 DTM cars utilized a true coil over rear. Not allowed in SCCA Prod. The '86 325 Group A cars utilized more of a production allowable suspension combining trailing arm adjustment with the OEM decoupled spring/shock arrangement.

Who is doing race compound brake shoes? Just Porterfield? Looking for an obscure application for a vintage car.

2 sets of 245/580R15. 1 set of 215/580R15. All MS compound, all from 2022 season/Runoffs Plenty of rubber, not ran more than 3 cycles. Can deliver to CenDiv Majors weekends. Email offers: schreyert@gmail.com

15 Hoosier 245/580R15 Tires. 3-5 heat cycles, stored in temp. controlled garage. Left over from late 2020 races and Runoffs. Soft Medium Soft Medium $60/Tire OBO. Take one, take all, Will make a decent deal if you make this quick and easy! Can deliver to the Cat at Road America on July 9...